|
|
N. T. Wright on Pierced for our Transgressions |
|
|
|
N. T. Wright does not like Pierced for our Transgressions, as he explains HERE. Some have already responded to him HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE. While we are grateful for constructive criticism, Wright is mistaken at several important points. We offer a brief response. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
What’s all the fuss about? |
|
|
|
We wrote a short article, giving a flavour of our book, for the 2006 Oak Hill College yearbook. It also appeared in the March 2007 edition of Evangelicals Now, and a few other places. This would be a good place to start if you want to get an overview of why penal substitution matters, what some critics have been saying about it, and why their objections don’t stand up. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
R. C. Moberly on the atonement |
|
|
|
R. C. Moberly’s account of the atonement, Atonement and Personality (London: John Murray, 1901), left no room for penal substition. Alistair Seabrook, one our friends at Oak Hill (and now a pastor in Cambridgeshire, England), wrote his Masters dissertation on the subject, and has kindly given us permission to post his devastating response here.
MOBERLY ON THE ATONEMENT PDF (0.1 MB)
|
|
|
|
|